Free shielding tool · preliminary estimate

RF shielding effectiveness calculator

Compare a far-field solid-sheet shielding estimate with the effect of one seam or aperture, while keeping the limiting factor and calculation limits visible.

Field verification and shielding design required

Preliminary comparison only. This far-field estimate is not a measured enclosure result or a construction specification. Confirm the complete shield and test plan with a qualified RF shielding professional.
Shield material
Overall preliminary shielding effectiveness43.5 dB

Limited by the seam or aperture in this simplified comparison.

Material SE (A + R + B)140 dB cap (219.6 dB formula)
Seam/aperture SE (20 log₁₀(λ/2L))43.5 dB
Your 10 mm opening, not the copper foil, sets this shield's performance. The material's 140 dB cap (219.6 dB formula) is unreachable until seams and penetrations are treated.
Assumptions

Far-field plane wave, one worst opening, and overall SE as min(material, aperture), a simplification of combined leakage. A zero opening means no aperture is modeled for a solid sheet; RF mesh requires a positive opening. No credit for gaskets, doors, louvers, penetrations, bonding, or workmanship. Solid-sheet material values are a first-pass comparison only, not an enclosure result.

Do not build or budget from this number. Use the applicable current test plan and field verification. IEEE 299-2006 is inactive-reserved, not a current certification claim.

How this comparison works

The calculator uses a far-field plane-wave Schelkunoff estimate for a solid sheet and an aperture estimate, then shows the lower result. It makes the seam or aperture visible because a high material figure alone is not an enclosure result.

What this does not model

It does not model near-field coupling, enclosure geometry, multiple openings, seams, doors, gaskets, louvers, penetrations, bonding, coating condition, corrosion, workmanship, frequency sweeps, or a measured room or enclosure result. RF mesh is aperture-only here, not a solid-sheet calculation.

Important

This far-field, one-opening comparison is an educational planning aid, not an enclosure measurement, compliance result, or engineering design. It omits the seams, doors, penetrations, bonding, workmanship, geometry, frequency range, and site conditions that can control real shielding performance. Confirm the project design and current test plan with a qualified RF shielding professional.

Published references

Open the source material and verify the requirements or values that apply to your situation.

Clemson CVEL-14-058: shielding effectiveness theory and calculatorLearnEMC: shielding effectiveness theoryLearnEMC: shielding effectiveness calculatorECT: aperture and opening shielding guidanceMIT: aluminum electrical properties referenceAFAPL-TR-69-89: historical galvanized-steel measured propertiesIEEE Access: galvanized-steel apparent-conductivity variabilityIEEE 299-2006 status page

Questions to verify

Frequently asked questions

Can I build or budget from this result?

No. This is an early planning and comparison aid, not a construction, procurement, compliance, or final engineering specification. A qualified RF shielding professional must establish the project design and verification plan.

Why can a seam or aperture set the result?

The tool reports the lower of the illustrative material and one-opening estimates. A seam, penetration, door, louver, or other opening can dominate real leakage, so a material number is not a guarantee of enclosure performance.

Is IEEE 299 a certification for this result?

No. IEEE 299-2006 is inactive-reserved. This calculator does not claim certification or a current standard result; use the applicable current test plan and field verification for the project.

Longlead flags public projects that may need RF shielding scope before the need becomes a named buying event: on major federal projects, typically 9–18 months before the GC buys out your scope.

See Longlead for shielding